Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41928334›Full record

ReviewNeurological research and practice2026

Preventive strategies against brain metastases: current state of the art and future directions.

Franziska Maria Ippen, Franz Felix Konen, Peter Hau, Frank Winkler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Franziska Maria IppenDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Franziska.Ippen@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6870-1784
Franz Felix KonenDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Peter HauDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Frank WinklerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain metastases (BM) represent a deleterious complication in many solid tumors. Despite advances in systemic therapy, BM are still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Consequently, preventive strategies are gaining importance and represent a dynamic area of investigation.

methodsRelevant literature and clinical trials were included, focusing on systemic therapies, multimodal treatment approaches, and future therapeutic avenues. Clinical trials reporting on secondary (preventing BM in a yet BM-free cancer patient) and tertiary prevention (preventing formation of new and recurrence of existent BM in a patient who has already developed BM) were included.

resultsA number of BM treatment-effective drugs have shown BM-preventive effects: In NSCLC, the EGFR-inhibitor osimertinib and ALK inhibitors like alectinib, brigatinib and lorlatinib lower the incidence of BM. In HER2-positive breast cancer, tucatinib and trastuzumab deruxtecan have preventive activity in patients without BM at baseline. In melanoma, BRAF/MEK inhibition and immunotherapy might be able to delay the onset of BM, although prospective data remains limited to date. Notably, drugs effective in BM therapy do not necessarily work in BM prevention, and vice versa. Preclinical data, including insights from Cancer Neuroscience, reveal novel preventive strategies warranting further exploration.

conclusionsPreventive strategies against BM in solid tumors are feasible, though data are sparse at this time. Preventing BM requires a personalized, multidisciplinary approach, integrating tumor biology, individual risk assessment, and therapeutic advances. Secondary prevention in patients with BM is as vital as tertiary prevention, warranting prospective validation of preclinical concepts.

Indexed as

Brain metastasesCancer neurosciencePreventionPreventive strategies

Identifiers

PMID41928334
PMCPMC13045146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.