ArticleGenome medicine2026
Alignment of spatial transcriptomics slices across diseases, platforms and conditions.
Article in Genome medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Alignment of spatial transcriptomics slices across diseases, platforms and conditions.Genome medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics (ST) facilitates the exploration of biological tissue structures and functions within spatial context. Slice alignment and integration are prevalent for analyzing ST data, and current algorithms either focus on adjacent slices or require prior information to guide alignment, limits their applications for downstream analysis. Here, we present AlignDG, an information theory-based graph model that jointly aligns and integrates ST slices across diverse diseases, platforms and conditions without prior information. Experimental results demonstrate that AlignDG outperforms existing baselines in terms of precision, robustness, and efficiency with approximate 50% of slices, providing an effective alternative for analyzing ST data (code: https://github.com/xkmaxidian/AlignDG ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.