ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2026
Modeling and forecasting neonatal mortality in Ethiopia: a comparative study using statistical, machine learning, and deep learning approaches.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEthiopia faces alarming stagnation in neonatal mortality rates (NMR) at approximately 27 deaths per 1,000 live births, jeopardizing Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.2 targets. Predictive analytics using advanced computational approaches remains underutilized for guiding interventions in low-resource settings.
methodsUsing national NMR data (1977–2023) from the WHO Global Health Observatory, we compared five forecasting models, ARIMA, Prophet, Random Forest, XGBoost, and LSTM, under unified walk-forward validation. Data were transformed as required by model assumptions. Performance was assessed using RMSE and MAE on the original NMR scale (deaths/1,000 live births).
resultsLSTM achieved the lowest errors (RMSE: 0.72, MAE: 0.58 deaths/1,000 live births), outperforming statistical and machine learning approaches. Forecasts indicate marginal decline to 27.7 (2030) and 27.1 (2034), far exceeding the SDG 3.2 target of ≤ 12. Structural barriers, including rural healthcare access limitations, substandard perinatal care quality, and diagnostic delays likely contribute to this stagnation.
conclusionEthiopia requires a tenfold acceleration in NMR reduction to meet 2030 targets. LSTM-based forecasting could enable proactive resource allocation (e.g., pre-positioning supplies in high-risk districts) but should be interpreted alongside subnational data and uncertainty bounds. This study establishes LSTM as a promising tool for neonatal mortality prediction in data-constrained settings, while acknowledging the need for validation with longer time series and exogenous predictors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.