Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41928296›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

The mediating role of academic engagement and the moderating role of academic self-efficacy in the relationship between critical thinking and academic competence: evidence from Chinese college students.

Weilin Su, Chen Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Weilin Su *School of Literature, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100089, China.
Chen Chen *School of Literature, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100089, China. chenchen@cnu.edu.cn.

Funding

Beijing Education Science Planning Project CCEA25164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on social cognitive theory, this study explores the key factors influencing academic competence among Chinese college students from the perspective of critical thinking. A moderated mediation model is hypothesized and tested to examine the roles of academic engagement (as a mediator) and academic self-efficacy (as a moderator) in such relationships. Data were collected through a three-wave longitudinal design involving 363 Chinese college students. The empirical test results first show that Chinese college students’ critical thinking has a significant positive impact on their academic engagement and competence. Secondly, their academic engagement not only has a positive impact on their academic competence, but also plays a mediating role in the process in which critical thinking affects academic competence. Thirdly, academic self-efficacy can positively moderate the relationship between critical thinking and academic engagement, thereby affecting their academic competence. More specifically, Chinese college students with higher academic self-efficacy have a stronger correlation between critical thinking and academic engagement, and ultimately achieve better academic results than students with lower academic self-efficacy. Therefore, these findings not only contribute to our theoretical understanding of cognitive processes, academic engagement, and competence development in higher education, but also provide practical suggestions for improving academic competence from the perspectives of educational administrations, faculty, and college students themselves.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceAcademic SuccessSelf EfficacyStudentsThinkingAcademiaAdolescentAdultChinaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleUniversitiesYoung AdultAcademic competenceAcademic engagementAcademic self-efficacyCritical thinkingModerated mediation model

Identifiers

PMID41928296
PMCPMC13169711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.