Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41928289›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026

Transformer-based multimodal model for estimation of appendicular lean mass using incomplete chest radiographs and electronic health record.

Kosuke Kita, Yuki Suzuki, Takashi Fujimoto, Keisuke Uemura, Yoshito Otake, Masayuki Furuya, Yuya Kanie, Tomohiro Wataya, Daiki Nishigaki, Junya Sato and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kosuke KitaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Radiology, the University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yuki SuzukiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Radiology, the University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Takashi FujimotoHealth Care Center, Sumitomo Hospital, 5-3-20 Kitaku Nakanoshima, Osaka, Osaka, 530-0005, Japan.
Keisuke UemuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Medical Engineering, the University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshito OtakeDivision of Information Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 8916-5, Japan.
Masayuki FuruyaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yuya KanieDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Tomohiro WatayaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Radiology, the University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Daiki NishigakiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Radiology, the University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Junya SatoDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Radiology, the University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Miyuki TomiyamaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Radiology, the University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Noriyuki TomiyamaDepartment of Radiology, the University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Seiji OkadaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Masatoshi HoriDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Radiology, the University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Takahito FujimoriDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Osaka, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. fujimori-takahito-ys@alumni.osaka-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-2758-7919

Funding

Japan Osteoporosis Foundation JP21K20966JSPS KAKENHI JP24KJ1559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSarcopenia is a muscle disease that increases the risk of falls, fractures, and mortality. Appendicular lean mass (ALM) assessment is central to its diagnosis, but standard methods like dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) have accessibility and cost issues. Previous artificial intelligence (AI) studies for sarcopenia assessment have been limited to single modalities and have not adequately addressed missing data modalities. This study aimed to develop and validate a multimodal AI model using frontal and lateral chest radiographs and electronic health record (EHR) data to estimate ALM and detect low muscle mass, and to investigate the robustness of a transformer-based algorithm to missing modalities.

methodsThis model development and validation study adhered to TRIPOD guidelines. The derivation cohort included 3,295 observations from 1,524 participants (mean age 61.9 years, 30% female). External validation was performed on an independent cohort of 3,771 observations from 1,976 participants (mean age 58.4 years, 59% female). Our multimodal model uses a transformer-based TabPFN to predict ALM from 75 features, which integrate 18 features extracted from each of the frontal and lateral chest radiographs by TorchXray with 39 features from EHR data (demographics and blood tests). Model performance for ALM estimation was evaluated using the root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE), and Pearson correlation coefficient. Estimation of appendicular lean mass performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

resultsThe prevalence of low muscle mass was 30% in the derivation set and 29% in the external validation set. The multimodal model achieved high accuracy in ALM estimation, with an RMSE of 1.23 kg, MAE of 0.96 kg, and correlation coefficient of 0.958 in the internal test set. In external validation, the model yielded an RMSE of 1.87 kg, and MAE of 1.41 kg, and correlation of 0.930. For estimation of appendicular lean mass in the external validation set, the model yielded an AUROC of 0.825 for males and 0.730 for females. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the model’s robustness to missing modalities, maintaining stable prediction errors in participants missing part of the EHR (RMSE: 2.00 kg), frontal (RMSE: 1.99 kg), or lateral (RMSE: 2.08 kg) chest radiographs.

conclusionsOur transformer-based multimodal AI model accurately estimates ALM and detects low muscle mass from routinely collected clinical data, outperforming unimodal approaches. The model demonstrated robustness even with missing data modalities, supporting its potential utility as a screening tool in clinical settings where data completeness varies. This approach has the potential to serve as an accessible screening tool for low muscle mass, especially in settings where DXA is not readily available.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsModels, BiologicalRadiography, ThoracicAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveSarcopeniaChest radiographyMissing modalityMultimodal artificial intelligenceSarcopeniaTransformer

Identifiers

PMID41928289
PMCPMC13123231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.