Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41928287›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2026

Improving 3D reconstruction quality for root phenotyping: assessing the impact of camera calibration and imaging parameters.

Peter Pietrzyk, Suxing Liu, Alexander Bucksch

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter PietrzykDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, 120 Carlton Street, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6794-8133
Suxing LiuSchool of Plant Sciences, The University of Arizona, 1140 E South Campus Dr, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7639-4470
Alexander BuckschDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, 120 Carlton Street, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. bucksch@arizona.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1071-5355

Funding

Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy DE-AR0000821National Science Foundation 2329282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate 3D reconstruction is essential for high-throughput plant phenotyping, particularly for studying complex structures such as root systems. While photogrammetry and Structure from Motion (SfM) techniques have become widely used for 3D root imaging, the camera settings used are often underreported in studies, and the impact of camera calibration on model accuracyccu remains largely underexplored in plant science. In this study, we systematically evaluate the effects of focus, aperture, exposure time, and gain settings on the quality of 3D root models made with a multi-camera scanning system. We show through a series of experiments that calibration significantly improves model quality, with focus misalignment and shallow depth of field (DoF) being the most important factors affecting reconstruction accuracy. Our results further show that proper calibration has a greater effect on reducing noise than filtering it during post-processing, emphasizing the importance of optimizing image acquisition rather than relying solely on computational corrections. This work improves the repeatability and accuracy of 3D root imaging for phenotyping pipelines by giving useful calibration guidelines. This leads to better trait quantification for use in crop research and plant breeding in downstream analysis.

Indexed as

3D reconstructionCamera calibrationPhotogrammetryPlant phenotypingRootsStructure from Motion (SfM)

Identifiers

PMID41928287
PMCPMC13047764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.