Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41928275›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2026

WebGWAS: a web server for instant GWAS on arbitrary phenotypes.

Michael Zietz, Undina Gisladottir, Kathleen LaRow Brown, Nicholas P Tatonetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael ZietzDepartment of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, 90069, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0539-630X
Undina GisladottirDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5892-0852
Kathleen LaRow BrownDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6625-4156
Nicholas P TatonettiDepartment of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, 90069, USA. Nicholas.Tatonetti@cshs.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2700-2597

Funding

Precision Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance: Leveraging AI to address drug safety knowledge gapsR35GM131905 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Nicholas P Tatonetti · 2019 to 2026
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex disease genetics is a key area of research for reducing disease and improving human health. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) help in this research by identifying regions of the genome that contribute to complex disease risk. However, GWAS are computationally intensive and require access to individual-level genetic and health information, which presents concerns about privacy and imposes costs on researchers seeking to study complex diseases. Publicly released pan-biobank GWAS summary statistics provide immediate access to results for a subset of phenotypes, but they do not inform about all phenotypes or hand-crafted phenotype definitions, which are often more relevant to study. Here, we present WebGWAS, a new tool that allows researchers to obtain GWAS summary statistics for a phenotype of interest without needing access to individual-level genetic and phenotypic data. Our public web app can be used to study custom phenotype definitions, including inclusion and exclusion criteria, and to produce approximate GWAS summary statistics for that phenotype. WebGWAS computes approximate GWAS summary statistics very quickly (<10 seconds), and it does not store private health information. We also show how the statistical approximation underlying WebGWAS can be used to accelerate the computation of multi-phenotype GWAS among correlated phenotypes. Our tool provides a faster approach to GWAS for researchers interested in complex disease, providing approximate summary statistics in short order, without the need to collect, process, and produce GWAS results. Overall, this method advances complex disease research by facilitating more accessible and cost-effective genetic studies using large observational data.

Identifiers

PMID41928275
PMCPMC13170032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.