Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41928261›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2026

Field study evaluating the efficacy of a combination formulation of fluralaner with moxidectin and pyrantel (BRAVECTO

Rafael Chiummo, Eva Zschiesche, Zvezdelina Kirkova, Domenico Otranto, Marcos Bezerra-Santos, Elias Papadopoulos, Dhimiter Rapti, Lea Heinau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rafael ChiummoMSD Saúde Animal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eva ZschiescheMSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH, Schwabenheim, Germany.
Zvezdelina KirkovaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Trakia University, 6000, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.
Domenico OtrantoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, Valenzano, 70010, Bari, Italy.
Marcos Bezerra-SantosDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, Valenzano, 70010, Bari, Italy.
Elias PapadopoulosSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Aristotle University, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Dhimiter RaptiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Agricultural University of Tirana, Tirana, Albania.
Lea HeinauMSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH, Schwabenheim, Germany. lea.heinau@msd.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a demand for broad-spectrum products effective against internal and external parasites to simplify dog-owner compliance with veterinary parasiticide treatment recommendations. A field study investigated the safety and efficacy of a broad-spectrum formulation of fluralaner, moxidectin, and pyrantel pamoate compared with a licensed afoxolaner-milbemycin oxime combination product in treating canine intestinal nematode infections in client-owned dogs at multiple sites in Europe.

methodsDogs with positive pre-treatment fecal egg counts (FEC) were randomized to treatment on day 0 with the investigative veterinary product (IVP), at dose rates of: IVP, fluralaner 10-20 mg/kg, moxidectin 0.025-0.050 mg/kg, pyrantel 5-10 mg/kg (n = 172); or a control product (CP), afoxolaner 2.5-5.2 mg/kg, milbemycin oxime 0.5-1.0 mg/kg (n = 86). On day 14, FEC were completed on all study dogs. Efficacy against any intestinal nematode species was claimed if the FEC reduction in ≥ 10 dogs initially positive for that species was ≥ 90%, and if the geometric mean difference between pre- and post-treatment FEC was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05).

resultsStudy dogs were enrolled at veterinary clinics in Albania (n = 60), Bulgaria (n = 111), Greece (n = 27), and Italy (n = 60). Where a sufficient number of infected dogs allowed for statistical comparison, geometric mean FEC reductions on day 14 versus day 0 in the IVP group were significant (P < 0.0001) for hookworms, Toxocara canis, Toxascaris leonina, Trichuris vulpis, and capillarid-type eggs. On the basis of geometric mean reductions in FEC relative to day 0, the efficacy of the IVP exceeded 99% against all intestinal nematode parasites, and FEC reductions in the CP exceeded 98%. The percentage of nematode-free dogs in the IVP group was statistically noninferior (P < 0.0001) to the CP group and even statistically superior at the α = 0.025 level of significance (one-sided). There were no treatment-related adverse events.

conclusionsIn client-owned dogs, the combination of fluralaner-moxidectin-pyrantel is safe and effective for the treatment of intestinal infections with hookworms, ascarids, including T. canis, and whipworms. On the basis of the complete elimination of parasite ova from the feces evaluated in this study, this fluralaner-moxidectin-pyrantel combination demonstrated to be significantly superior (P < 0.025) to an afoxolaner-milbemycin combination in the treatment of canine intestinal nematode infections.

Indexed as

AnthelminticsDog DiseasesIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticIsoxazolesMacrolidesNematode InfectionsPyrantelAnimalsDogsDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationEuropeFecesFemaleMaleNaphthalenesA1443 compoundafoxolanerAnthelminticsDrug CombinationsIsoxazolesMacrolidesmilbemycin oximemoxidectinNaphthalenesPyrantelPyrantel PamoateAscaridCanineCapillariaFluralanerHookwormMoxidectinToxascarisToxocaraTrichurisWhipworm

Identifiers

PMID41928261
PMCPMC13126913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.