Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41928202›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

#MEDToo - sexual harassment in medical education: perceptions and coping strategies of medical students in Germany, a qualitative study.

Sabine Drossard, Iris Warnken, Marco Kuchenbaur, Anja Härtl, Inga Hege

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sabine DrossardDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, Würzburg, 97080, Germany. Drossard_S@ukw.de.
Iris WarnkenMedical Didactics and Education Research, DEMEDA, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Marco KuchenbaurMedical Didactics and Education Research, DEMEDA, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Anja HärtlDepartment of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Inga HegePersonal and Interpersonal Development in Health Care Education, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSexual harassment is a form of power abuse prevalent in healthcare, with medical students experiencing it frequently, especially in practical training. A high proportion of medical students in Germany experience harassment or discrimination during their education, yet detailed data on their perceptions and coping strategies in the clinical environment are lacking.

aimThis study aims to analyze the experiences of final-year medical students in Germany with sexual harassment, identify factors that hinder or support coping, and offer recommendations for preventive measures and support services.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured, guideline-based individual interviews with medical students in their final year of medical training at the University Hospital Augsburg (UKA) who reported a history of sexual harassment during their studies. We analyzed the data using Kuckartz’s qualitative content analysis method.

resultsWe conducted twelve interviews with ten female and two male medical students. Our analysis revealed five interrelated themes illustrating how experiences of gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment intersect with processes of professional identity formation within hierarchical medical training environments. First, participants described a spectrum of gendered boundary violations occurring in both educational and clinical relationships. These experiences were shaped by the specific relational context and involved supervisors within hierarchical training structures and patients within therapeutic encounters. Second, such incidents were closely intertwined with students’ emerging professional identities, often generating uncertainty in interpretation and tension between maintaining professional conduct and protecting personal boundaries. Third, rigid hierarchies and cultural normalization within medical training environments reinforced silence and limited students’ willingness to challenge inappropriate behavior. Consequently, students often adopted adaptive strategies characterized by restraint, minimization, or strategic silence. Finally, participants articulated the need for institutional structures, cultural change and practical skills to enable them to set professional boundaries with confidence.

conclusionStudents’ narratives reflect a dynamic interplay between gendered boundary violations, role insecurity, hierarchical dependency, constrained agency, and perceived gaps in institutional support. Sustainable prevention of SH in medical education requires both structural reforms and educational programs to enhance individual competencies.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalSexual HarassmentStudents, MedicalAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCoping SkillsFemaleGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchSexismSexual Harassment, Gender-Based Discrimination, Professional Identity Formation, Medical Education, Medical Studies, Students, Final Year, Undergraduate Education, Workplace Violence, Interview Study

Identifiers

PMID41928202
PMCPMC13064183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.