ArticleBMC cancer2026
Application of contrast-enhanced CT-based radiomics with machine learning to predict WHO/ISUP grading in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo predict the World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) using multiple machine learning models based on contrast-enhanced CT, and to compare their performance, thereby exploring a non-invasive method for preoperative pathological grading.
methodsSeventy-six patients with ccRCC (65 low-grade and 11 high-grade) from September 2021 to August 2023 were retrospectively included. Regions of interest (ROI) were manually delineated on enhanced CT images, and radiomics features were extracted. The dataset was first split into training and test sets (50%/50%). To address class imbalance, the training set was oversampled using the RandomOverSampler algorithm. Feature scaling and selection using the Maximum Information Coefficient (MIC) were applied strictly within the training set. Radiomics models were built using twelve machine learning classifiers. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsAmong the 12 classifiers, five (GradientBoostingClassifier, RandomForestClassifier, AdaBoostClassifier, XGBClassifier, and CatBoostClassifier) reported an AUC of 1.000 on the test set; XGBClassifier had the highest sensitivity (0.944) and accuracy (0.969). The high AUC values should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. DCA suggested that most models provided a net benefit across a wide threshold range.
conclusionMachine learning models based on contrast-enhanced CT show potential as a non-invasive tool for distinguishing high-grade from low-grade ccRCC. This preliminary study suggests a promising direction; however, further validation with larger, multi-center cohorts is required before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.