Observational studyBMC neurology2026
Efficacy and safety of rimegepant in Chinese women with pure menstrual migraine: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate rimegepant’s effectiveness and safety in the short-term prevention of pure menstrual migraine.
backgroundRimegepant’s effectiveness and safety in both acute and preventive treatment of migraine have been demonstrated by numerous studies. However, no evidence is available for its effect on menstrual migraine, especially pure menstrual migraine. We conducted an observational and retrospective study to investigate whether rimegepant could serve as an effective short-term preventive treatment for pure menstrual migraine.
methodThis was a retrospective study. Data of patients diagnosed with pure menstrual migraine was selected from the Headache Outpatient Center in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. All these patients received 75 mg of rimegepant orally disintegrating tablets every other day during the perimenstrual period (from − 2 to + 3 days of menstruation) of three consecutive menstrual cycles. The change in attack duration from baseline was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included reduction of peri-menstrual headache day (PHD), severity, Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores, Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) scores, Hamilton Anxiety Scale-14 (HAMA-14) scores, Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) scores, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores. Change in the percentage of patients using acute migraine medications from baseline, proportion of patients with a ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% decrease from baseline in PHD were also analyzed as efficacy endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) were collected to evaluate the tolerability.
resultWe analyzed data from 43 patients with a mean age of 37.0 years. After three cycles of perimenstrual short-term preventive treatment with rimegepant, patients’ attack duration was decreased by 20.5 h from baseline (p < 0.001). The population experienced a 6-point reduction in headache severity (p < 0.001) and a 1.1-day improvement in PHD (p < 0.001) compared to baseline. Patients’ quality of life improved, with a 11.4-point improvement in HIT-6 scores (p < 0.001) and a 10.1-point improvement in MIDAS scores (p < 0.001). No significant improvement was observed in indicators of anxiety (p = 0.788), depression (p = 0.745), or sleep quality (p = 0.903) compared to baseline. Only 2 patients reported mild adverse events.
conclusionOur study demonstrated that 3-cycles perimenstrual prophylactic treatment of rimegepant was associated with reductions in migraine attack duration, perimenstrual attack frequency, severity, as well as improved patients’ life quality. Rimegepant might be an effective way for patients with pure menstrual migraine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.