ArticleBMC public health2026
Grocery store workers' knowledge, attitudes, and barriers influencing uptake of COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of the study was to gain insight into the knowledge, behavior, attitudes and beliefs related to COVID-19 vaccines, and communication preferences of U.S. grocery store workers.
methodsIn-depth interviews were conducted from May 2021 through June 2022 with 75 grocery store workers across the United States (US) who identified themselves as Asian, Black, Hispanic, or White persons. Researchers used maximum variation sampling to recruit a diverse sample by race and ethnicity, age, sex, union status, and geographic location. Rapid Turn-Around (RTA) techniques were utilized to conduct qualitative data analysis.
resultsOf the 75 total participants, 39 were female and 36 were male. Participants identified as Asian (n = 16), Black or African American (n = 19), Hispanic or Latino (n = 16) and White (n = 22) persons and ranged in age: 18–34 years (n = 28), 35–49 years (n = 20) and ≥ 50 years (n = 27). Most (79%) participants reported that they were vaccinated against COVID-19 and considered various factors when deciding to get vaccinated such as protecting oneself and loved ones, vaccine safety and potential side effects, others’ experiences with vaccination, the vaccine development process, beliefs regarding their immune systems, vaccine effectiveness, and similarities between the COVID-19 and influenza vaccines. Most unvaccinated women expressed concerns about side effects, compared to about half of the unvaccinated men. Specifically, most unvaccinated female workers had concerns related to fertility issues. Participants’ attitudes regarding employer vaccine incentives and mandates and sources used to learn about the vaccine varied by vaccination status. Although participants’ employers had provided them information regarding the COVID-19 vaccine, these communications were not in participants’ preferred formats.
conclusionUnvaccinated participants’ attitudes and beliefs suggest there is a critical opportunity to address misinformation related to COVID-19 vaccines and potential side effects among grocery store workers. This study provides evidence of a gap for culturally and linguistically appropriate health communication efforts that are aligned with grocery workers’ health communication preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.