ArticleJournal of integrative plant biology2026
Enhancing CRISPR-Cas12a base editing in plants with LbCas12a variants and introns.
Article in Journal of integrative plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing CRISPR-Cas12a base editing in plants with LbCas12a variants and introns.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
- Unlocking the power and potential of the Cas12 family members and their ancestors for crop genome editing.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cytosine base editors (CBEs) and adenine base editors (ABEs) are powerful tools for precise genome editing in plants. Conventionally, such base editors are built upon the CRISPR-Cas9 systems where Cas9 nickases are used. To expand the base editing scope and minimize off-target effects, base editors derived from the CRISPR-Cas12a systems are desired. However, the use of deactivated Cas12a (dCas12a) in such base editors constrains the editing activity, preventing the wide use of Cas12a base editors for plant research and trait development. In this study, we demonstrate the use of an ABE based on the efficient LbCas12a-RRV variant to introduce herbicide-resistant mutations in OsACCase in rice. To improve Cas12a CBEs and ABEs, we inserted introns into the coding sequence of dLbCas12a-RRV. This intron-containing Cas12a-CBE shows substantial improvement in editing efficiency in rice, compared to the intron-less counterparts. By contrast, the improvement of ABE with the intron-containing dLbCas12a-RRV is very limited, partly due to the already high baseline editing efficiency of the intron-less dLbCas12a-RRV ABE. Testing of these base editors in poplar shows elevated C-to-T base editing by dLbCas12a-RRV-intron-CBE. For A-to-G editing, ABEs built upon dLbCas12a-RV and dLbCas12a-RRV variants showed significant improvement over ABEs derived from wild-type LbCas12a and the ttLbCas12a variant. The addition of introns to dLbCas12a-RRV does not further improve the base editing efficiency. With whole genome sequencing in rice, we evaluated genome editing specificities with these improved Cas12a base editors. Our analyses show that both intron-containing Cas12a CBE and ABE barely introduce guide RNA-dependent off-target mutations. However, they can generate guide RNA-independent off-target mutations, which are likely attributed to the high enzymatic activities of the deaminases. Collectively, our study demonstrates the successful use of a Cas12a base editor for trait development and reports improved Cas12a CBEs and ABEs for precise base editing in plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.