ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
The shrinking soundscape: New evidence for memory distortion of auditory scenes.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People often misremember complex scenes by blending what they actually perceived with what they inferred, leading to the extrapolation of complex scenes in memory. Such memory distortions are commonly linked to reality-monitoring errors (RMEs) and have been well-documented in both the visual and haptic modalities. In the auditory domain, however, research using a similar methodology has instead observed a contraction in memory for the temporal content of sounds (Hutchison et al., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1469-1489, 2012). The present study investigated whether scene extrapolation in memory also occurs in the auditory modality by testing participants' recall of sound sources simultaneously present within a scene. Using an auditory recognition task derived from that used by Hutchison et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1469-1489, (2012), participants memorized target scenes composed of three or four sound sources, varying in semantic consistency (i.e., sources from the same category or not). Memory was tested using a trial-by-trial design, in which probe scenes were presented at the same or different size (i.e., with more or fewer sound sources). Results showed that participants tended to remember targets as containing fewer sound sources than were presented, suggesting a memory contraction rather than the extrapolation observed in other modalities. This contraction was attenuated when scenes were semantically consistent. The findings are discussed in relation to plausible (a)modal processes that could underlie scene distortions in memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41928042What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.