ArticleEJNMMI research2026
Evaluation of a clinically efficient [
Article in EJNMMI research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary lesions affect a large population globally, posing huge challenges in clinical management and public healthcare. Functional imaging-based diagnosis facilitates the classification and treatment planning for pulmonary lesions. [
resultsForty patients with pulmonary lesions confirmed by histopathology (28 malignant, 12 non-malignant) were included in the analysis. Kinetic parameters were derived from time-activity curves generated by integrating dynamic and static data points using different compartment models with image-derived input functions. Semi-quantitative parameters, including maximum standardized uptake value (SUV
conclusionsThe combined 10-min dynamic and two-phase static [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.