ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2026
A visual perceptual perspective on gaze in social robotics.
Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Where and when should a robot look during interaction with humans? Intuitively, human-human interaction serves as the blueprint. In such interactions, gaze plays a central role, both in visually guiding action and in signaling communication. Yet, most social robotics research still relies on the oversimplified eye-mind assumption, equating gaze with visual attention, and often implements gaze behaviors without accounting for perceptual limits or individual variability. We identify three core challenges at the intersection of psychology, visual perception, and robotics: (1) disentangling the dual functions of gaze, (2) understanding the visual perceptual mechanisms underlying gaze perception, and (3) adapting to individual, cultural, and clinical variability in gaze behavior. By examining these challenges in both robot interpretation and production of gaze, we argue that social robotics benefits from insights into human gaze and provides a powerful testbed for theory development, enabling controlled, interactive experiments that deepen our understanding of social attention. We conclude by conceptualizing social gaze as a soft-constraints inference and production process under uncertainty, linking visual perceptual mechanisms and social meaning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.