Trial reportAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Comparison of Postoperative Edema Between Sub-SMAS and Subperichondrial Dissection Planes in Rhinoplasty Using Ultrasonographic Skin Thickness Measurements.
Trial report in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to objectively compare postoperative edema between subperichondrial and sub-SMAS dissection planes by assessing skin thickness via ultrasonography.
methodsForty-four patients undergoing rhinoplasty were randomly assigned to two groups based on the dissection plane: Group I (subperichondrial) and Group II (sub-SMAS). Skin thickness was measured at the nasal tip, supratip, and dorsum preoperatively and at postoperative week 1 and month 1.
resultsMean dissection time was 13.3 ± 1.4 minutes in Group I and 12.5 ± 1.4 minutes in Group II (p = 0.05). Baseline skin thickness was similar between groups at all measurement points. At postoperative week 1, Group I showed significantly lower thickness values at the tip (p = 0.024) and supratip (p = 0.027) compared to Group II; no significant difference was observed at the dorsum (p = 0.13). By month 1, skin thickness differences between groups were no longer significant at any measurement point. The percentage increase in thickness was significantly higher in Group II than in Group I at the tip (p < 0.001) and supratip (p = 0.027). No significant differences in percentage change were found at any site by the first-month evaluation.
conclusionSubperichondrial dissection is associated with less edema at the nasal tip and supratip in the early postoperative period. However, these differences become clinically insignificant by the end of the first month. Although subperichondrial dissection requires a slightly longer operative time, this difference is clinically negligible and should not be considered a limitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41928003What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.