Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41927998›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

The ABC of BBA: A Personal Perspective of a 10 Point Plan.

Donald A Hudson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Donald A HudsonUCT Private Academic Hospital, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa. donald.hudson@uct.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1489-0089

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of bilateral breast augmentation (BBA) is not just to enlarge the breast, but to create an aesthetically pleasing enlarged breast. This is an elective surgical procedure, often performed on young healthy women-yet the incidence of revision is in the region of 20%. There is a wide variation in what these patients want cosmetically. A "10 point" plan is presented which should be considered in every patient undergoing BBA. Each point addresses a critical issue in BBA. Understanding the mechanics of the procedure is as important as knowing the technical details of the operation. There is no simple "one operation for all" approach in breast augmentation, but the hybrid augmentation represents an advance in this procedure. The incidence of revision surgery should be lowered when a careful, "thought out" approach is adopted.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

BreastBreast ImplantationBreast ImplantsMammaplastyAdultCohort StudiesEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansPatient SatisfactionReoperationRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeBilateral breast augmentationBreastBreast implantBreast implantation

Identifiers

PMID41927998
PMCPMC13314810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.