ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Integrating large language models for enhanced predictive analytics in healthcare.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physicians frequently confront time-sensitive decisions under uncertain conditions, necessitating reliable tools for forecasting clinical outcomes. Although clinical predictive models have the potential to assist in these critical decisions, their widespread adoption is hindered by complexities in data handling, model development, and integration into clinical workflows. This study introduces a novel framework (Hopkins LLM) leveraging structured electronic health records (EHRs) data to develop and deploy clinical large language models (LLMs) that act as multi-task-capable predictive engines to support clinically constrained decision-support tasks with minimal barriers to implementation. Employing the advanced LLaMA architecture, consisting of 7 billion parameters, our model was pre-trained on a comprehensive corpus and subsequently fine-tuned and tested on a dataset of 42,160 patients within Johns Hopkins Health System, addressing a spectrum of clinical and operational prediction tasks. We validated our model across three diverse external health systems and four key prediction tasks involving 1,329 patients, including 30-day all-cause readmissions, 90-day all-cause mortality, 30-day intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and treatment recommendations. The proposed Hopkins-LLM framework achieved a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.84 [0.82, 0.88], yielding a significant 0.28 advancement over zero-shot baseline LLMs (p<0.05). These findings underscore the promise of LLMs as unified, user-friendly clinical prediction systems, adept at reasoning across diverse data sources to enhance decision-making at the point of care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.