ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2026
Bidirectional brain-heart interactions in health and disease.
Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel neurovascular coupling analysis method based on simultaneous EEG-fNIRS for investigating the effects of working memory load.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- APOM-associated inflammation and apoptosis in stroke-exacerbated myocardial infarction: implications for brain-heart interactions.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Article
- Accelerated Biological Aging, Neurodegenerative Disease, and Mortality in Cardiovascular Disease Patients: Mediation and Modification Analysis.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Heart failure and cognitive impairment: a narrative review.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Heart-Brain Axis Dysregulation in Depression: Mechanisms and Implications for Neuromodulation.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Review
- Loneliness and cognitive aging: a brain-heart axis perspective on a modifiable risk.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- Editorial: Neurocardiology: the science of heart-brain interactions.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The brain and heart constantly communicate with each other to adapt to changes in the environment. In recent years, we have seen increasing recognition that brain-heart interactions influence many cognitive and behavioural functions, and that disturbances in this bidirectional relationship can have detrimental effects on both organs. Clinically, such disturbances can manifest as cardiac dysfunction following acute psychological stress or a brain injury such as acute ischaemic stroke, or as cognitive disorders in patients with acute or chronic heart disease. In this Review, we provide an overview of the physiological interaction between the heart and the brain and show how injury or dysfunction in one of these organs can lead to dysfunction in the other. We describe the current state of knowledge on neuronal correlates and humoral mediators of brain-heart interactions, as well as state-of-the-art methods for studying these interactions. We highlight the clinical implications of disturbances in physiological brain-heart communication for various clinical conditions, including Takotsubo syndrome resulting from emotional stress or from brain disorders, cardiac complications after stroke (so-called stroke-heart syndrome), and cognitive dysfunction in patients with cardiac diseases such as heart failure and atrial fibrillation. In addition, we address sex and gender differences in this bidirectional relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41927938What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.