Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41927934›Full record

ArticleDiscover mental health2026

An international qualitative exploration informing the development of a national sport mental health service for young athletes.

Daniel Vella Fondacaro, Paul Mansell, Matthew Slater

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel Vella FondacaroDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta. fvell06@um.edu.mt.
Paul MansellDepartment of Sport and Sciences, University of Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Matthew SlaterDepartment of Sport and Sciences, University of Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health services designed for young athletes may enhance access to care and deliver more specialised interventions when compared to the general national health service waiting lists. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of experienced leaders in the field of sport psychology and psychiatry regarding the development of a national sport mental health service, including potential barriers and facilitators to seeking help. Interviews were conducted with fifteen sport psychologists and sport psychiatrists working in seven different countries across various sports, and reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data within an interpretive description paradigm. Four main themes emerged: (1) Athlete’s Ecological Environment, (2) Service Strengths and Challenges, (3) Prioritising Athlete Wellbeing, (4) Specific Mental Health Population. Each theme comprised subthemes which provided deeper insight into the viewpoints of these experienced professionals. The findings emphasised the importance of fostering a healthy professional team dynamic that effectively engages with the athlete’s ecological environment, and the potential benefits of having a national sport mental health service. A central focus was the importance of addressing the athlete’s mental health and wellbeing using a client-centred eclectic approach, as this were regarded as critical for optimal performance. This study represented an initial effort to understand the importance of a national sport mental health service in young athletes and served as a foundation for future research in this field.

Indexed as

AthletesMental healthNationalSportsYoung

Identifiers

PMID41927934
PMCPMC13172167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.