ArticleScientific reports2026
Experimental evaluation of natural material mixtures for soil resistivity reduction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soil electrical resistivity is influenced by multiple factors, including temperature, geography, soil chemical composition, precipitation, and particularly moisture content, which exerts the most significant influence. Nevertheless, combining natural materials in varying proportions can produce distinctive physicochemical and electrical properties, relevant for the development of low-resistivity materials in engineering applications that require soil resistivity reduction. In this study, 15 mixtures were formulated using four natural materials with contrasting physicochemical characteristics. Experimental evaluations included electrical resistivity as a function of moisture content (10%-100%), pH, and electrochemical activity (ORP), the latter assessed through cyclic voltammetry. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was also applied to identify patterns among the measured variables. The results show a progressive decrease in resistivity as moisture content increases. Likewise, the relationship between pH and conductivity displayed a non-linear behavior, with the lowest resistivity occurring within the pH range of 8.50-9.50. Mixtures exhibiting higher electrochemical activity were also the most conductive. Furthermore, PCA enabled the classification of mixtures according to their electrical behavior. These findings demonstrate that an integrated approach-combining physicochemical, electrical, and electrochemical analyses-is essential for the rational design of functional natural materials intended to serve as soil resistivity reducers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.