ArticleCommunications biology2026
Advancing airborne eDNA sampling methods for monitoring diverse terrestrial vertebrate communities.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Comparison between Passive airDNA Collection and Extraction Methods on the Recovered Terrestrial Vertebrate Assemblage.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective biodiversity survey methods are crucial to monitor ecosystems threatened by climatic fluctuations and anthropogenic pressures. Here we advance methods for collecting a novel source of biodiversity data - airborne environmental DNA (eDNA), and investigate whether it yields habitat- and season-specific signatures of terrestrial vertebrate communities. Using custom-made, portable, and low-budget samplers, we sampled airborne eDNA in three protected nature areas across Denmark spanning different nature types and seasons. We show that coarse grade air filters, larger filter area, increased airflow rate, and dry storage of filters at -20 °C yield detections of higher numbers of vertebrate taxa with more consistent detections of communities across samples. Further, we find that detected vertebrate communities are characteristic of the sampled nature types and seasons. Collectively, these refinements enable effective monitoring of terrestrial vertebrate biodiversity using portable and low-budget air samplers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.