ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning-based phishing classification framework for accurate detection using optimized URL intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proliferation of internet services has exposed customers to phishing attempts that steal sensitive information via false URLs. Intelligent categorization systems are required to tackle dynamic phishing techniques, which defy rule- and signature-based detection. The existing phishing detection systems leverage handmade characteristics or fixed blacklists. That suggests they generalize poorly on zero-day and camouflaged phishing URLs. High false-positive rates and inadequate scalability hamper their performance. It proposes an Adaptive Deep URL Intelligence Network (ADUIN). Deep learning model with optimized URL lexical, host-based, and structural properties. We optimize features using a hybrid relevance-ranking method and train a multi-layer deep neural architecture to understand complicated non-linear phishing patterns. URL intelligence dynamically updates the architecture to resist attack behavior changes. According to experiments on the benchmark phishing dataset, ADUIN is more accurate, exact, and remembers than machine learning classifiers. Zero-day phishing URLs are detected with minimal false alarm rates by the algorithm. The suggested system improves phishing URL classification accuracy, versatility, and intelligence. Real-time online and enterprise security solutions benefit. Under high load, the recommended ADUIN model has 95% classification accuracy, 93% precision, 92% zero-day detection rate, 3.5% false positives, optimal accuracy with 50 features, and 210 ms delay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.