ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and validation of glucose trajectory subphenotypes in critically ill patients on early enteral nutrition: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Glycemic Trajectory and Variability on Ischemic Stroke Prognosis and Exploration of Its Mechanisms: A Comprehensive Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to characterize blood glucose trajectories during the early phase of enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill patients and develop a predictive model for these trajectories to improve clinical management and patient outcomes. A retrospective analysis was conducted on critically ill patients who received continuous EN for ≥ 2 consecutive days, using data from the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary hospital. Group-Based Trajectory Modeling (GBTM) was employed to identify distinct subgroups based on patterns of blood glucose changes. An early risk prediction model for trajectory classification was constructed using the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. A total of 478 patients met the inclusion criteria. Three distinct blood glucose trajectory subgroups were identified: Mild Hyperglycemia Stable (41.84%), Moderate Hyperglycemia Peaking (36.40%), and Severe Hyperglycemia Peaking (21.76%). The XGBoost model exhibited robust discriminative ability and good calibration. Key predictors of trajectory classification included insulin use, history of diabetes, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6. This study highlights the heterogeneity of glycemic trajectories during the early phase of EN in critically ill patients. The developed XGBoost model demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance and may serve as a valuable tool for maintaining glycemic stability and optimizing outcomes in critically ill patients receiving nutritional support in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.