ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
Boosting brainpower in ageing: Task-specific and transfer effects of tDCS-enhanced working memory training.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ageing is associated with neural alterations that impair cognitive abilities, particularly working memory (WM), which is the capacity to temporarily store and manipulate information essential for daily functioning. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown promise in enhancing WM in older adults by modulating cortical excitability and promoting neuroplasticity. However, findings on the combined effects of tDCS and WM training remain inconsistent, especially regarding transfer of training gains to nontrained WM tasks (near-transfer effects). This study investigated the behavioural and neural effects of tDCS across distinct WM phases (encoding, retention/manipulation, and recall) in older adults. Participants were divided into two groups, receiving either active or sham tDCS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during six sessions of adaptive WM training conducted over three weeks. Electroencephalographic (EEG) data were collected, focusing on theta and alpha oscillatory activity. Pre-, post-, and follow-up assessments included modified Letter Span and Corsi Tests, each featuring retention and manipulation conditions. Results revealed no additional behavioural or neural benefits of tDCS. Nonetheless, both groups exhibited task-specific performance improvements posttraining, observed exclusively in manipulation conditions, which were sustained at 1-month follow-up. These improvements were likely driven by the Operation Span (OSPAN) task, which engaged executive processes central to manipulation. Neural findings revealed distinct oscillatory changes and behaviour-neural associations, with correlations unique to the tDCS group that may indicate subtle modulatory effects. However, these results remain tentative given the limited sample size and inter-individual variability. Overall, the findings support adaptive WM training in older adults and underscore the importance of developing personalised tDCS protocols to optimise cognitive and neurophysiological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41927837What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.