ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Multimodal Imaging-Based Prediction of Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop a nomogram and assess the predictive value of imaging features-derived from ultrasound, mammography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of primary breast lesions-in combination with clinicopathological factors and serological tumor markers, for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer (BC). Retrospective analysis was used in 294 breast cancer patients who received NAC and subsequently underwent surgery at the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from 2017 to 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 206) or a validation cohort (n = 88) in a 7:3 ratio. Data collected included preoperative imaging features of the primary breast lesion from conventional ultrasound, mammography, and contrast-enhanced MRI, as well as clinicopathological factors and serological tumor markers. After comparing the baseline characteristics between the two cohorts, univariate analysis was performed on the training cohort. Variables with significant results in the univariate analysis were incorporated into a multivariate logistic regression model. Backward stepwise selection was employed to identify independent risk factors of nonpathological complete response (non-pCR). A nomogram was constructed based on the final multivariate model. The model's discriminatory power was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and its calibration was assessed with a calibration plot and the Hosmer Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Of 294 enrolled patients, 87 (29.6%) achieved pCR. Univariate analysis in the training cohort identified multiple factors potentially associated with non-pCR. These factors included clinical pathological markers such as ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 status; ultrasound features including tumor location, distance from the nipple, hyperechoic halo, posterior echo, and calcification; mammographic characteristics encompassing mass margin, microcalcification, distribution and morphology of microcalcification, asymmetry, density of asymmetry, and other signs; and contrast-enhanced MRI parameters like background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and mass margin. Multivariate logistic regression analysis subsequently demonstrated that ER, HER2, Ki-67, tumor location, distance from the nipple, morphology of microcalcification, and mass margin on contrast-enhanced MRI independently predicted non-pCR (p < 0.05). A nomogram incorporating these independent predictors showed excellent discrimination; the training cohort's AUC was 0.833 (95% CI 0.772-0.893), the validation cohort's AUC was 0.749 (95% CI 0.640-0.857). This robust predictive model represents a significant step toward individualized treatment strategies by accurately forecasting the likelihood of pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41927823What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.