ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Automated Detection and Classification of Pleural Effusion on Computed Tomography Using Deep Learning.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the performance of a two-stage deep learning-based artificial intelligence framework for the automatic segmentation and etiological classification of pleural effusion from noncontrast thoracic computed tomography (CT) images. In this retrospective study, patients with pleural effusion detected on noncontrast thorax CT and with available pathogenic and/or cytological examinations after diagnostic thoracentesis were included. In the first stage, pleural effusion regions were automatically segmented using a U-Net-based deep learning model. In the second stage, pleural effusions were classified into three groups-empyema, malignant, and transudative-using quantitative imaging features derived from the segmentation masks, including area-, density-, and texture-based features. Logistic regression, support vector machines, random forest, and gradient boosting algorithms were used for classification. The U-Net-based segmentation model demonstrated high agreement in delineating pleural effusion regions and achieved successful segmentation performance on the validation dataset. In the etiological classification performed using quantitative features extracted after segmentation, the highest performance was obtained with tree-based models. The gradient boosting and random forest algorithms achieved 96% accuracy and a macro F1-score of 0.95 in three-class etiological discrimination. Feature importance analysis showed that pleural effusion area, the standard deviation of intensity within the mask, and GLCM-based parameters reflecting texture heterogeneity were the most discriminative features for classification. The two-stage artificial intelligence approach developed in this study achieved high accuracy in the automatic segmentation and etiological classification of pleural effusion on noncontrast thorax CT images. The proposed system has the potential to serve as a strong decision support tool in clinical practice by enabling rapid, objective, and reproducible evaluation of pleural effusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41927820What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.