ArticleScientific reports2026
Impact of accurate load forecasting on electricity market stability in Japan using classical time-series and deep-learning methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a novel multi-regional evaluation framework for short-term load forecasting (STLF) in Japan’s structurally fragmented, regionally heterogeneous electricity market. While previous research often treats the Japanese grid as a monolith or focuses on a single forecasting paradigm, this study addresses the critical research gap of spatial performance variability across the 50/60 Hz frequency divide. Motivated by the critical need for regional accuracy, this research compares three forecasting paradigms: the classical SARIMA model, the probabilistic Hidden Markov Model (HMM), and the deep learning Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network. Using hourly load data from 2019 to 2022 for all nine Japanese regional power systems, the models are evaluated across two horizons (day-ahead and hour-ahead. Furthermore, an Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) framework is employed to generate 95% Prediction Intervals (PI) under extreme operating conditions—including maximum demand, minimum demand, and public holidays—in order to assess model robustness under atypical scenarios. Results show that no single model is universally superior; forecasting performance is highly context and region-dependent. In Tokyo on a maximum demand day, LSTM achieves the best accuracy (4.55% MAPE), outperforming SARIMA (6.31% MAPE). In contrast, for Chugoku under the same scenario, SARIMA (2.72% MAPE) slightly outperforms LSTM (2.80% MAPE). The HMM proved particularly effective for atypical conditions, delivering the most accurate forecast in Tohoku on a public holiday (4.03% MAPE versus 6.93% for SARIMA). The findings underscore the critical impact of statistical forecasting errors on regional financial risk. This framework reveals that improved accuracy can reduce daily financial burdens by 5.4 million yen in Chugoku, 102 million yen in Tohoku, and up to 642 million yen in Tokyo. By linking forecasting accuracy, uncertainty, and economic impact, the proposed framework provides practical guidance for context-aware forecasting strategies in Japan’s fragmented electricity market.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.