ArticleScientific reports2026
Three-dimensional reconstruction of gigapixel whole-mount histopathology specimens with RAPID.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Histopathology often serves as the gold standard in medical diagnosis but lacks a spatial three-dimensional axis of information due to the inherent process of two-dimensional tissue slide preparation. Recovering this third dimension would enable correlation with in vivo imaging, improve multimodal data integration, and open new doors for three-dimensional quantitative tissue analysis. This study presents the RAPID framework, which tackles this task of registering whole slide images of whole-mount histopathology specimens into a three-dimensional stack. Our proposed framework leverages a DINOv2-pretrained ViT-L14 foundational model to consistently detect anatomical features, which are used to align a stack of unregistered whole slide images (WSIs) to obtain a three-dimensional reconstruction. RAPID is optimized to work with high-resolution WSIs at 0.25 [Formula: see text]m/pixel, leading to gigapixel reconstructions that can be used for cell-level downstream tasks. We validate our framework on various external validation sets and find that RAPID obtains an accurate reconstruction in 91.7-93.5% of cases, thereby significantly outperforming a current state-of-the-art reconstruction method. Unlike existing methods limited to serial sections, RAPID handles the sparse sampling intervals (3000-4000 [Formula: see text]m) routinely used in clinical pathology. We demonstrate its utility for three-dimensional radiology-pathology correlation, enabling direct volumetric comparison between histopathology and pre-operative imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.