ArticleScientific reports2026
Soil health improvement and climate change mitigation in soybean agroecosystems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although soil health indicator is extensively examined worldwide, Japan has yet to establish a soil health assessment framework calibrated to the unique properties of Andosols. In this study, we evaluated a long-term (19-year) organically managed soybean field and generated soil health scores using a cumulative normal distribution function to develop a site-specific benchmark. Treatments were tillage (no-tillage, moldboard plowing, and rotary tillage), cover crop (rye, hairy vetch, and fallow), and the addition of fertilizer or biochar in four replications. Intensive tillage reduced soil health, with soil health score under moldboard plowing significantly lower than no-tillage during 2020–2022 (p < 0.05). No-tillage with cover crop and biochar enhanced soil health status by sustaining soil organic carbon (SOC) at 3.8–4.8%. Overall soil health score was positively correlated with SOC (r = 0.7; p < 0.01), while higher soil health score was strongly associated with reductions in net global warming potential (rs = − 0.95; p < 0.01). SOC emerged as one of the most influential indicators, directly influenced soil ß-glucosidase activity (r = 0.84, p < 0.001), substrate-induced respiration (r = 0.7, p < 0.001), NO3– (r = 0.65, p < 0.05), and EC (r = 0.36, p < 0.01). Although NT-based systems may not achieve the highest yields due to interannual variability, they may offer substantial environmental benefits by contributing to long-term climate change mitigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.