ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparative performance of recent and prior large language models and pediatric residents on pediatric in-training examination questions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent vision-enabled multimodal large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance on high-stakes medical examinations, yet their capabilities in pediatrics, particularly for image-based questions, remain underexplored. We analyzed 498 unique questions with Korean–English terminologies, taken from 10 pediatric in-training examinations (ITEs) conducted by a single pediatric department between 2016 and 2023. Approximately 22% of items contained medical images. Three recent publicly accessible LLMs (GPT-4.1, Gemini-2.5-Pro, Claude-4.1-Opus) and three prior models (GPT-4o, Gemini-1.5-Pro, Claude-3.5-Sonnet) were tested. Recent LLMs significantly outperformed fourth-year residents (R4) (77.7–78.9% vs. 70.1%, all P < 0.008), while prior models showed comparable results. For text-only items, three recent LLMs achieved a superior proportion correct (PC) compared with R4 (80.1–81.0% vs. 69.6%). None of the evaluated LLMs surpassed R4 performance on image-included questions; both prior and recent models consistently exhibited inferior PC on image-included items than text-only questions. Outputs demonstrated high repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.98) across most models. In this study, multimodal LLMs achieved high performance on the Pediatric ITE, with further improvements observed over the past year and results exceeding those of senior residents. Nonetheless, performance on image-included questions was inferior to that of text-only questions and did not exceed that of senior residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.