ArticleScientific reports2026
Pareto-optimized stacked ensemble machine learning framework for predicting bearing capacity of driven piles from static load test data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since traditional empirical methods frequently fail to capture complex soil-pile interactions, accurately evaluating the bearing capacity of driven piles remains a critical yet difficult task in geotechnical engineering. In this regard, this study proposes a novel machine learning framework for predicting the pile bearing capacity (PBC) of driven piles using a stacking guided by a multi-objective Pareto optimization approach. Using a comprehensive dataset that includes 472 records from the literature, the framework combines random forest (RF), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) to increase predictive accuracy and generalizability. The dataset consists of a range of geological, geometric, and loading conditions, in addition to explanatory input features from the standard penetration test (SPT) dataset, such as pile diameter, soil depth, different soil layers, and the SPT-N values. Model interpretability is achieved through Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Partial Dependence Plots (PDP), revealing key influencers such as pile diameter and SPT-N values along the shaft and tip. The stacking model improved predictive accuracy over the respective base-level models, using a Pareto-optimized stacking model, achieving a coefficient of determination of 0.9471. It also had reduced mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) on the testing dataset as compared to the base-level models. Sensitivity and parametric analyses of the PBC confirmed that the model calculations were significant and demonstrated that pile diameter and soil layer thicknesses influence PBC. Finally, this approach provides geotechnical engineers with an accurate and interpretable tool to predict PBC, supporting safer and more cost-effective pile foundation designs in complex soil conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.