ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning detection of ectopic canines and molars in mixed dentition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ectopic eruption (EE) during the mixed dentition is a significant dental anomaly that requires early detection to prevent complications that may impact function, aesthetics, and health. Advances in artificial intelligence point to the need for automated methods to detect ectopic canines and molars. This study aimed to develop a DL model to automatically detect EE of canines and molars on panoramic radiographs. This retrospective study utilised a dataset of panoramic radiographs from pediatric patients in the mixed dentition stage. EE of canines and molars was defined using angular and positional criteria. Images were annotated by calibrated specialists and divided into training, validation, and test sets. Performance was evaluated using precision, recall, F1-score, Dice coefficient, and mean average precision (mAP). For ectopic canines, precision was 0.786, recall 0.771, F1-score 0.778, Dice coefficient 0.768, and mAP 0.793. For ectopic molars, precision was 0.812, recall 0.650, F1-score 0.722, Dice coefficient 0.757, and mAP 0.719. These results indicate more consistent detection performance for ectopic canines than for molars. DL demonstrated effective diagnostic capability for detecting EE on panoramic radiographs. This tool has potential to improve early diagnosis, support pediatric dental treatment planning, and enhance radiology education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.