ArticleScientific reports2026
Environmental and economic evaluation of Egyptian cement production using refuse-derived fuel from municipal solid waste.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Egypt’s cement sector is a major environmental polluter, yet life cycle-based environmental assessments of this industry remain scarce in the country, highlighting a critical research gap that this study addresses. This study employs Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impacts of cement manufacturing under four Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF) thermal substitution scenarios, Sc-II (20%), Sc-III (50%), Sc-IV (80%), and Sc-V (100%), in comparison with a conventional baseline scenario (Sc-I). The functional unit is defined as one ton of produced cement, and the system boundary follows a cradle-to-gate approach, encompassing waste collection, RDF processing, fuel substitution, and cement production. The findings demonstrate a consistent and proportional relationship between RDF utilization rate and environmental performance, indicating that higher RDF substitution rates correspond to progressively greater reductions in emissions across the assessed impact categories. Sc-V had the lowest Global Warming Potential (GWP) score of 858.18 kg CO2-eq ton− 1. As compared to the Sc-I, Sc-V decreased GWP, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidants, and abiotic depletion by 19.1, 38.7, 33.7, 45.2, and 12.9%, respectively. The economic analysis shows that integrating 20% RDF slightly increases capital investment (0.026 to 0.033 $ ton⁻¹) but significantly reduces operating costs by 5.65 $ ton⁻¹, while net revenue remains stable (6.09 $ ton⁻¹). Additionally, RDF substitution saves 0.134 $ ton⁻¹ of cement compared to natural gas and hard coal, confirming that RDF is an economically viable and sustainable alternative fuel for cement production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.