ArticleScientific reports2026
AI-supported qualitative analysis of free-text responses on home care burden and support needs in Saxony.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The number of people in Germany requiring care has risen steadily, increasing the importance of informal care. This form of care is often associated with considerable psychological and physical strain. The aim of this study is to systematically categorize and qualitatively analyze the free-text responses from a survey on home care using an artificial intelligence-based approach in order to identify key challenges and support needs in home care from the perspective of informal caregivers and non-caregiving relatives. The study used data from a 2019 survey on home care in Saxony. Free-text responses were categorized and analyzed using GPT-4 Turbo within a hybrid human-AI workflow. All AI outputs were subsequently validated and corrected by researchers. Respondents reported substantial financial burdens for both care recipients and informal caregivers. They also highlighted structural barriers to accessing services and insufficient support from the care system. Improving home care requires structural measures, including the expansion of low-threshold counseling services, more flexible leave regulations, stronger financial security for informal caregivers, and the sustainable strengthening of care infrastructures. Given an AI error rate of 36.45%, the study emphasizes the need for human post-processing to ensure analytical accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.