ArticleScientific reports2026
An adaptive differential privacy framework for clinical llms with context-aware noise calibration, hierarchical budgeting, and real-time auditing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensuring that artificial intelligence can support clinical report generation without compromising patient privacy remains a critical challenge in healthcare AI. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework (PrivLLM-Guard) for differentially private large language models (LLMs) designed for real-time confidential medical text generation and summarization. While LLMs have demonstrated substantial potential in automating clinical documentation, the extreme sensitivity of healthcare data demands rigorous, formally grounded privacy guarantees. Our proposed framework addresses this need by combining advanced (ε,δ)-differential privacy techniques with three key innovations: (i) an adaptive noise calibration system that dynamically adjusts Gaussian noise parameters based on input sensitivity and real-time privacy risk scores, (ii) a hierarchical privacy budget allocation mechanism that assigns differentiated protection levels to medical data categories (e.g., patient identifiers, diagnoses, demographics) using Rényi Differential Privacy (RDP) accounting for tight composition bounds during long-sequence generation, and (iii) an integrated real-time privacy auditing module that continuously monitors information leakage probabilities and triggers adaptive mitigation responses. The framework integrates bidirectional transformer encoders with autoregressive decoders, further enhanced by privacy-aware attention mechanisms with calibrated noise injection (Eq. 5) and gradient perturbation via differentially-private SGD with adaptive clipping (Eqs. 3–4). Extensive experiments on three large-scale medical datasets (MIMIC-III with 2.1 M documents, i2b2 with 858 K records, and a proprietary hospital dataset with 1.5 M records) under strict privacy constraints (ε = 0.1, δ = 10⁻⁶) demonstrate BLEU-4 scores of 89.7% for generation and ROUGE-L scores of 92.3% for summarization, representing a 16.8% improvement over the best baseline. The model processes 512-token sequences in real time with an average latency of 245 ms, a throughput of 19.3 requests per second, and memory usage of just 4.2 GB. Formal computational complexity analysis shows O(n²·d + n·κ) inference cost, where n is sequence length, d is model dimension, and κ represents per-token noise calibration overhead. Compared to state-of-the-art privacy-preserving LLMs, By improving the utility–privacy trade-off by 15.8%, mitigating membership inference risk by 65.9%, and reducing computational overhead by 23.4%, the framework establishes a more secure, efficient, and trustworthy foundation for clinical AI deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.