Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41927534›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026

Autism-associated learning patterns show reduced credit assignment to outcome-irrelevant features.

Ido Ben-Artzi, Liron Rozenkrantz, Nitzan Shahar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ido Ben-ArtziSchool of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. idobenartzi@mail.tau.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5971-8613
Liron Rozenkrantz *Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel.
Nitzan Shahar *School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1364-6738

Funding

Israel Science Foundation (ISF) 3564/25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans often make decisions based on information that is irrelevant to actual outcomes, a tendency widely documented in behavioral economics and cognitive psychology as a hallmark of biased or suboptimal learning. While prior research has shown that individuals with autism may be less susceptible to such biases in structured, static decision-making contexts, it remains unclear whether this resistance generalizes to more complex, dynamic learning environments. In this pre-registered adversarial collaboration, we used a reinforcement learning task known to reflect outcome-irrelevant learning, where irrelevant stimulus features (e.g., spatial location) are systematically assigned with value, resulting in suboptimal decisions. This design allowed us to test two competing hypotheses. The first posited that autistic individuals may engage more in value updating of irrelevant features, due to increased susceptibility to process irrelevant information. The second, based on an enhanced rationality framework, predicted that autistic individuals would show greater resistance to outcome-irrelevant learning and demonstrate more optimal learning compared to non-autistic individuals. Computational modeling and model-agnostic analyses revealed that participants reporting a clinical autism diagnosis, compared to non-autistic participants, exhibited substantially reduced outcome-irrelevant learning. Importantly, reduced outcome-irrelevant learning was also significantly correlated with higher autistic traits across the full population sample, suggesting that it reflects a broader, dimensional cognitive profile rather than only a categorical group difference. These findings demonstrate, for the first time, enhanced resistance to outcome-irrelevant learning biases in autism, revealing a domain in which autistic cognition may confer advantages for rational decision-making in noisy environments. Our results add to growing evidence for domain-specific cognitive advantages in autism and extend to suggest that this cognitive style, observed across the entire cohort, may offer a more adaptive approach to managing biases in decision-making.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderDecision MakingLearningReinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleReinforcement Machine LearningYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41927534
PMCPMC13172356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.