ReviewBMJ open respiratory research2026
Implementing shorter all-oral treatment durations for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in the UK: from concept to application.
Review in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a global public health threat associated with high mortality and challenging treatment regimens. The UK, like many countries, faces a growing incidence of MDR-TB, with 105 (1.9% of all notified cases) treated as MDR-resistant or rifampicin-resistant TB in 2024. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of shorter, all-oral regimens such as BPaLM (bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, moxifloxacin), yet their implementation in the UK presents unique challenges, particularly around the antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) agenda, such as the lack of licensed drugs, pharmacokinetic/dynamic concerns, fragile supply chains and high cost of second-line antituberculosis drugs. This narrative review outlines how the UK has addressed implementation hurdles through coordinated efforts by the British Thoracic Society MDR-TB Clinical Advice Service and National Health Service England. This collaboration has facilitated the adoption of new regimens, with 54 out of 60 requests for using pretomanid-containing regimens approved in the UK up to January 2026. Furthermore, resources like the TB Drug Monographs and the shift to video-observed therapy have streamlined care delivery. The UK has effectively navigated the transition to shorter, all-oral MDR-TB regimens, significantly enhancing patient care and operational efficiency. The integration of clinical guidance, AMS principles, policy reform and specialised monitoring tools provides a robust framework for managing evolving treatment landscapes and delivering patient-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.