ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2026
Sustaining a career in general practice: a qualitative study of experienced GPs in South West England.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGeneral practice in the UK faces a growing retention crisis, with many experienced GPs reducing hours or leaving patient care amid rising workload and system strain. Understanding what sustains GP careers is crucial to stabilising the workforce.
aimTo explore how experienced GPs' career intentions have evolved since the 2016 ReGROUP study and to identify factors influencing decisions to stay, reduce, or leave clinical work. DESIGN AND
settingA qualitative interview study was undertaken with experienced GPs in South West England, and analysed using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model.
methodWe conducted 19 semi-structured interviews with GPs who had previously completed the ReGROUP survey. Transcripts were analysed thematically with input from public and professional stakeholders.
resultsGPs described escalating clinical and administrative workloads, moral distress, and reduced control as key pressures driving burnout and exit. Hybrid access models, secondary care workload transfer, and punitive regulatory processes intensified strain. Retention was supported by clear workload boundaries, continuity of care, supportive practice systems, portfolio careers, and collective advocacy. Some GPs maintained engagement by reshaping their roles or practice structures to regain control and sustain meaning.
conclusionRetention depends not only on reducing workload but also on restoring the conditions that make being a 'good GP' feel possible, through continuity, manageable demand, and supportive organisational culture. Creating space for flexibility, autonomy, and role redesign may help sustain experienced GPs and strengthen workforce resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.