ArticleBone & joint open2026
Optimal clinical management of tenosynovial giant cell tumours: a UK perspective.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) management is variable across the UK. Our aim was to examine these differences in clinical practice and develop consensus statements regarding the management of TGCTs. Methods: A three-stage modified Delphi technique was conducted with surgical, clinical, and medical oncology experts from across the UK. Key areas of controversy were identified in a virtual meeting on 23 January 2025. This was followed by an online questionnaire that was iteratively refined, and a virtual consensus meeting on 2 September 2025, to discuss topics where agreement had not yet been reached. Results: This consensus developed a definition for unresectable TGCT and criteria for patient referral from TGCT local management to multidisciplinary team (MDT) review with access to current appropriate treatment options and further defined unresectable TGCT. Diffuse, recurrent, and/or unresectable TGCT, or those requiring complex procedures should be reviewed through a centralized MDT case review at a sarcoma centre, given the complex multidisciplinary nature of TGCT management. Conclusion: The clarification of classification of localized and diffuse TGCTs, and the definition of unresectable TGCTs, as well as standardizing the criteria for referral to a sarcoma MDT, will facilitate the improved management of TGCTs across the UK and address regional resource challenges.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.