ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2026
Grey matter volume associations with personality functioning in a clinical cohort of female youths.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a severe mental illness, although its neurobiological underpinnings remain largely unknown. Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (sMRI) in adolescents can offer insights into potential biomarkers to help advance early detection and targeted intervention. However, previous findings have been mixed, possibly due to clinical heterogeneity that may be better captured using a dimensional approach to personality functioning (PF). The current study explored grey matter volume (GMV) in youth with varying degrees of BPD pathology, and associations with dimensional PF. N = 93 females (14-21 years) comprising three groups (full-threshold BPD, sub-threshold BPD, and healthy controls) underwent sMRI and were assessed with the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1). Groups were combined to reflect dimensional personality pathology. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to determine associations between the STiP-5.1 total score, and each of its four elements with: (i) total GMV, (ii) GMV in individual brain regions defined by the Desikan-Killiany-Tourville atlas, (iii) selected regions of interest (ROIs). All analyses were statistically non-significant: STiP-5.1 total and total GMV (p = 0.61); STiP-5.1 total and individual brain regions (all corrected p values ≥0.82); STiP-5.1 total and ROIs (all corrected p values ≥0.91). Results were non-significant for each element, and a validity check using BPD criteria confirmed STiP-5.1 findings. We found no evidence of an association of dimensionally assessed PF with GMV in young females. The pursuit of clinical research efforts on other potential biomarkers using dimensional conceptualisations of PF may represent worthy endeavours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.