ArticleFetal diagnosis and therapy2026
Prospective Clinical Testing of a "Beat-To-Beat" Extraction Method for Fetal Electrocardiography.
Article in Fetal diagnosis and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThere is a critical clinical need for fetal electrocardiography (fECG), but no methods have successfully translated to the ambulatory setting. We developed a novel fECG system combining custom hardware and null coherence-based signal processing, then evaluated its feasibility for fECG extraction in normal and at-risk pregnancies.
methodsWe applied the fECG system to 43 patients (25 normal fetuses, 18 abnormal). FECG studies were 15 min long and utilized 12-24 electrodes and 1 ground. Signal processing was done during collection with additional post-processing. Two clinician raters blinded to gestational age, indication, and each other's assessments, graded the quality of studies using a 5-point scale. The raters measured the PR, QRS, and/or QTc intervals twice where possible.
resultsIn 43 subjects, 30 had time-resolved fECG separation (70%) and the median grading (based on two raters across two sessions) was 3 or greater in 26/43 fetuses (60%) with graded studies. Sixty three percent of cases (27/43) had a measurable fetal cardiac time interval. Signal quality was reduced in participants with BMI ≥30 and during the vernix period (25-32 weeks' gestation).
conclusionOur findings demonstrate the feasibility of fECG across gestation, enabling beat-to-beat signal extraction and CTI measurement with a 63% success rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.