ArticlePloS one2026
Football (Soccer) refereeing and cardiovascular health: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysical and psychological stress can precipitate Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) events. Football (soccer) is a popular sport globally, with referees covering significant distances, often at high-intensity during a match, and facing potentially intense psychological stress from high-stakes decision-making and potential verbal abuse from players and spectators. The aim of this scoping review was to identify what is known about the cardiovascular health and risk of acute cardiac events in referees during football matches.
methodsA librarian-assisted search of six databases was completed, with publications written in English or with English translation available included. The PRISMA checklist was utilised and data were extracted from publications to form both descriptive and thematic analyses.
resultsAnalysis of the publications identified five key themes: 1) the cardiovascular risk factors profile of football referees (prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes), 2) psychological stress and abuse experienced by referees (both verbal and physical abuse are reported at all levels of football, contributing to stress, anxiety, and anger), 3) physical intensity and activity levels of football referees (distance covered per match), 4) physiological aspects of football refereeing and 5) cardiac events on the football field (referees are rarely involved in providing CPR).
conclusionsEvidence indicates that football referees face significant cardiovascular demands and psychological stress, along with a vulnerability to physical abuse, yet there is a lack of research on educational interventions to promote their cardiovascular health. Additionally, referees may act as first responders during ACS events, highlighting the necessity for them to be knowledgeable about relevant symptoms and trained for effective response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.