ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2026
Managerial Challenges in the Clinical Use of Checklists: Proven Benefits, Yet Untapped Potential?
Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Research shows that surgical safety checklists can reduce adverse events in hospitals, but their real-world effectiveness varies due to inconsistent implementation. This study investigates managerial barriers to effective checklist use across surgical subspecialties, focusing on factors like organisational structure, workplace culture, and staff attitudes. Patient safety is a shared responsibility, yet differences in priorities and communication between system-level and frontline management can hinder safety efforts. Theories such as high reliability and complex adaptive systems highlight the importance of feedback and alignment between strategic goals and operational realities. Methods: Using semi-structured interviews at two Norwegian university hospitals, the study explores perceptions of checklist use among section and clinic managers. Nine participants, representing both nursing and medical backgrounds, provided insights into the challenges of integrating checklists into daily practice. The data were analysed to identify barriers and their underlying causes, aiming to inform strategies for improving checklist implementation and patient safety outcomes. Results: This evaluation of surgical safety checklist practices reveals a significant gap between policy and practice. While the checklist is widely accepted and integrated into routine surgical workflows, its actual use is rarely monitored or discussed across managerial levels. Senior managers often assume compliance without verification, and checklist non-compliance is seldom reported through formal deviation systems. Communication about checklist use is fragmented, and key elements-such as the team presentation round-are frequently overlooked. The checklist is treated more as a static tool than as part of a dynamic safety system. Systemic barriers, including competing priorities and limited feedback mechanisms, hinder its effective use. Conclusion: To enhance patient safety, hospitals must adopt a more adaptive and reflective safety culture, integrating checklist use into broader governance frameworks and establishing mechanisms for monitoring, feedback, and continuous learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.