ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2026
Association Between Diclofenac Sodium Use and Reduced Cycle Cancellation from Premature Ovulation in Women with Diminished Ovarian Reserve Undergoing IVF: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether diclofenac sodium administration reduces premature ovulation and improves in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). Patients and Methods: Retrospective cohort study conducted at a single academic reproductive center from January 2022 to March 2025. We included women with DOR (anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH] < 1.1 ng/mL, antral follicle count [AFC] < 5) undergoing autologous IVF cycles with single dominant follicle development. A total of 1164 cycles from 616 patients were analyzed, comparing 382 cycles with diclofenac sodium 75mg daily from trigger day to oocyte retrieval versus 782 cycles without treatment. The primary endpoint was cycle cancellation due to premature ovulation. Secondary endpoints included oocyte retrieval success, fertilization rates, embryo outcomes, and clinical pregnancy rates. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models with multivariable adjustment were used to account for correlation between multiple cycles from the same patient. A sensitivity analysis restricted to first cycles per patient (n=616) was performed using logistic regression to validate primary findings. Results: Diclofenac sodium significantly reduced cycle cancellation due to premature ovulation (7.3% vs 19.8%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.73, P=0.003) and decreased the proportion of cycles with no oocytes retrieved (21.8% vs 27.1%, adjusted OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.84, P=0.007). Normal fertilization rates were higher in the diclofenac sodium group (77.5% vs 69.8%, P=0.041), though this lost significance after adjustment (P=0.184). The proportion of cycles without viable embryos was comparable between groups (42.3% vs 41.8%, P=0.727). Among limited fresh embryo transfers (n=124), clinical pregnancy (19.2% vs 11.2%, P=0.847) and live birth rates (15.4% vs 8.2%, P=0.948) were similar. The sensitivity analysis using first cycles per patient (n=616) confirmed these findings, showing a 47% reduction in premature ovulation odds with diclofenac sodium (adjusted OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.94, P=0.031). Conclusion: Diclofenac sodium is associated with reduced premature ovulation and improved oocyte retrieval success in DOR patients, though embryonic and pregnancy outcomes remain similar. These observational findings require validation through prospective randomized controlled trials with adequate power to assess cumulative reproductive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.