Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41926495›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Effects of a native avian predator (weka; Gallirallus australis) and colony density on breeding success of a burrow-nesting seabird (tītī; Ardenna grisea).

Joanna K Carpenter, David Fletcher, James Arbuckle, Morgan Coleman, Becky Goodsell, Andrew Gormley, Aurora Metzger, Trent Moss, Kate H Orwin, Rakiura Tītī Islands Administering Body and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Joanna K CarpenterBioeconomy Science Institute, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7666-2439
David FletcherDavid Fletcher Consulting Limited, Karitane, New Zealand.
James ArbuckleBioeconomy Science Institute, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Morgan ColemanBioeconomy Science Institute, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Becky GoodsellBioeconomy Science Institute, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Andrew GormleyBioeconomy Science Institute, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Aurora MetzgerInvercargill, New Zealand.
Trent MossTohu Environmental, Invercargill, New Zealand.
Kate H OrwinBioeconomy Science Institute, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Rakiura Tītī Islands Administering Body
Rakiura Tītī Committee
Darren ScottInvercargill, New Zealand.
Luke SuttonBioeconomy Science Institute, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Theo D W ThompsonDepartment of Conservation, Invercargill, New Zealand.
Puke TimotiBioeconomy Science Institute, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Amy WhiteheadBioeconomy Science Institute, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Phil O'B LyverBioeconomy Science Institute, Lincoln, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As island ecosystems are restored, native predators are recovering and re-establishing interactions with their prey. However, compared with widely-publicised impacts of invasive predators, little is known about the dynamics and stability of native predator-prey dynamics on islands. Prey species such as seabirds may still be vulnerable to population decline, as even native predation can become unsustainable at a population-level when combined with other threats. Large seabird colonies may buffer against native predation by diluting its per-capita impact, but this will depend on the functional response of native predators to prey densities. Here, we test the impact of a predatory native rail (weka, Gallirallus australis) on breeding success of a burrow-nesting seabird (tītī/muttonbird/sooty shearwater, Ardenna grisea) that nests in dense colonies on the Rakiura Tītī Islands, southern New Zealand. We used burrowscopes and trail cameras to assess tītī breeding success (N = 126 nests) at three sites with weka, and two sites without. We also tested how tītī burrow density (a proxy for colony density) influenced breeding success. Tītī breeding success (probability of an egg hatching and then fledging) varied across sites, ranging from 0.39 to 0.88. Model predictions indicated that weka had a negligible effect on tītī breeding success overall, with breeding success increasing with increasing tītī burrow density, although both relationships had considerable uncertainty. Trail camera data showed weka activity was primarily diurnal, and that weka activity at monitored burrows did not increase during the period nests are most vulnerable (mid-January until late-February). We suggest that weka predation on tītī may be inversely density dependent, and that large colonies absorb the impact of predation. However, if tītī populations decline in the future due to other factors (e.g., climate change, harvest), the impact of weka on breeding success may increase, resulting in accelerated, localized tītī population declines.

Indexed as

BirdsNesting BehaviorPredatory BehaviorReproductionAnimalsBreedingEcosystemNew ZealandPopulation DensityPopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID41926495
PMCPMC13046109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.