Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41926492›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

The intergenerational legacies of research disinvestment, aid retrenchment and transactional compacts on global women's health.

Roxanne C Keynejad, Abigail M Hatcher, Diksha Sapkota, Nataly Woollett, Simone Honikman, Alexis Palfreyman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roxanne C KeynejadKing's Women's Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4434-3526
Abigail M HatcherFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Diksha SapkotaGriffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2122-8747
Nataly WoollettFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Simone HonikmanPerinatal Mental Health Project, Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7045-5532
Alexis PalfreymanCentre for Impact on Violence and Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Funding

NCIPC CDC HHS R01 CE003334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global health funding by the United States government declined precipitously in 2025, triggering a cascade of international disinvestment in women's health in low and middle-income countries, followed by a new era of 'America First' aid policy. Successive budget cuts by other high-income countries compounded the effects of these abrupt policy and geopolitical changes on women's health, safety, and access to life saving and health assuring prevention, care and treatment, worldwide. Abandonment of active programmes and research studies disproportionately harms women by disrupting employment, reversing progress in education, eroding essential services and undermining community partnerships. The global health funding crisis weakens systems and diminishes capacity, impacting women's physical and mental health, economic survival, and equity of opportunity across the life-course. New proposals to tie aid funding to data sharing have disproportionate impacts on women, while continued hostility to gender diversity places non-binary and transgender people at increased risk of further marginalisation. The current moment of crisis also illuminates profound limitations of the international systems which previously governed global health, indicating opportunities for transformation. In this Essay, we outline the foreseeable, intergenerational harms of defunding initiatives which promote and enhance the health and safety of women everywhere or tie their funding to agendas which would erode women's reproductive autonomy. Amid deliberate efforts to disorientate opposition through simultaneous and sequential upheavals and concerted censorship of academic freedom, we call for concerted outcry, organised resistance, and synchronous action to safeguard women's health and rights before more damage is done.

Identifiers

PMID41926492
PMCPMC13046280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.