ArticlePLOS global public health2026
The intergenerational legacies of research disinvestment, aid retrenchment and transactional compacts on global women's health.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Perinatal mental health impacts of intimate partner violence in the African region: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- To adjust, reform, or transform? Criteria for distinguishing efforts to change knowledge practices in global health.Global public health · 2026Article
- Impact of problematic Khat use on mental health in Ethiopia's Somali Regional State: a population study.BMJ mental health · 2026Article
- From housing to home and belonging: structural violence, ontological (in)security and women's mental health.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global health funding by the United States government declined precipitously in 2025, triggering a cascade of international disinvestment in women's health in low and middle-income countries, followed by a new era of 'America First' aid policy. Successive budget cuts by other high-income countries compounded the effects of these abrupt policy and geopolitical changes on women's health, safety, and access to life saving and health assuring prevention, care and treatment, worldwide. Abandonment of active programmes and research studies disproportionately harms women by disrupting employment, reversing progress in education, eroding essential services and undermining community partnerships. The global health funding crisis weakens systems and diminishes capacity, impacting women's physical and mental health, economic survival, and equity of opportunity across the life-course. New proposals to tie aid funding to data sharing have disproportionate impacts on women, while continued hostility to gender diversity places non-binary and transgender people at increased risk of further marginalisation. The current moment of crisis also illuminates profound limitations of the international systems which previously governed global health, indicating opportunities for transformation. In this Essay, we outline the foreseeable, intergenerational harms of defunding initiatives which promote and enhance the health and safety of women everywhere or tie their funding to agendas which would erode women's reproductive autonomy. Amid deliberate efforts to disorientate opposition through simultaneous and sequential upheavals and concerted censorship of academic freedom, we call for concerted outcry, organised resistance, and synchronous action to safeguard women's health and rights before more damage is done.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.