Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41926484›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Directional leads applied to spinal cord stimulation: A computational modelling study.

Zhen Wu, Nianshuang Wu, Penghao Wang, Cheng Zhang, Changzhe Wu, Xiaolin Huo, Guanghao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhen WuBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioelectromagnetism, Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Nianshuang WuBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioelectromagnetism, Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Penghao WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioelectromagnetism, Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Cheng ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioelectromagnetism, Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Changzhe WuBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioelectromagnetism, Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaolin HuoBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioelectromagnetism, Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Guanghao ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory of Bioelectromagnetism, Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-2271

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is widely used to treat various types of pain. Directional leads, which exhibit directional focusing properties, have been applied in deep brain stimulation. Their targeting capability holds potential for further enhancing clinical SCS protocols. However, the actual stimulation effects of directional leads remain unclear and require further investigation. This study employed a computational modelling approach to develop SCS simulation models and a multi-compartment cable model of sensory fibers. These models were used to simulate the stimulation effects of directional leads in the human spinal cord. According to the reciprocity theorem, the evoked compound action potential (ECAP) generated by activated nerve fibers at recording contacts was calculated. Compared to traditional percutaneous leads, directional leads produced higher electric field strength and activating function in the spinal cord under the same current intensity, thereby activating a greater number of nerve fibers. Furthermore, increasing the angle between contacts further enhanced the advantages of directional leads. When the directional lead was rotated, the stimulation direction deviated from directly facing the spinal cord, resulting in a decreased number of activated nerve fibers. Under identical stimulation conditions, ECAP amplitudes recorded at different directional contacts showed variation; however, these differences remained within 6%. This study demonstrated the directional focusing advantage of directional leads and compared ECAP outcomes under varying conditions. The findings provide a solid theoretical foundation for the clinical application of directional leads.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, NeurologicalSpinal CordSpinal Cord StimulationAction PotentialsHumansNerve Fibers

Identifiers

PMID41926484
PMCPMC13046245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.