ArticlePloS one2026
Directional leads applied to spinal cord stimulation: A computational modelling study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is widely used to treat various types of pain. Directional leads, which exhibit directional focusing properties, have been applied in deep brain stimulation. Their targeting capability holds potential for further enhancing clinical SCS protocols. However, the actual stimulation effects of directional leads remain unclear and require further investigation. This study employed a computational modelling approach to develop SCS simulation models and a multi-compartment cable model of sensory fibers. These models were used to simulate the stimulation effects of directional leads in the human spinal cord. According to the reciprocity theorem, the evoked compound action potential (ECAP) generated by activated nerve fibers at recording contacts was calculated. Compared to traditional percutaneous leads, directional leads produced higher electric field strength and activating function in the spinal cord under the same current intensity, thereby activating a greater number of nerve fibers. Furthermore, increasing the angle between contacts further enhanced the advantages of directional leads. When the directional lead was rotated, the stimulation direction deviated from directly facing the spinal cord, resulting in a decreased number of activated nerve fibers. Under identical stimulation conditions, ECAP amplitudes recorded at different directional contacts showed variation; however, these differences remained within 6%. This study demonstrated the directional focusing advantage of directional leads and compared ECAP outcomes under varying conditions. The findings provide a solid theoretical foundation for the clinical application of directional leads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.