ArticlePloS one2026
Clinical impact of broad- versus narrow-spectrum empiric therapy in acute cholangitis: A Japanese claims database study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical benefit of broad-spectrum empiric therapy in patients with acute cholangitis is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of broad-spectrum and narrow-spectrum empiric therapies on patient outcomes using a Japanese claims database. The study included patients who were diagnosed with acute cholangitis between April 2014 and August 2022, aged 18-99 years, received antibiotics, had blood cultures collected, and underwent biliary drainage. Patients who received empiric therapy with carbapenems, piperacillin/tazobactam, or fourth-generation cephalosporins were included in the broad-spectrum group, whereas others were included in the narrow-spectrum group. Of the 4,755 eligible patients, 3,377 were categorized into the narrow-spectrum group and 1,378 into the broad-spectrum group. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, older age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, the presence of sepsis, and intensive care unit admission were associated with increased 30-day in-hospital mortality, whereas the receipt of broad-spectrum empiric therapy was not (adjusted odds ratio, 1.37 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.84-2.23]). In the propensity score matching analysis, there was also no association between the receipt of broad-spectrum empiric therapy and 30-day in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 0.82-2.50]). Furthermore, in the propensity score-matched cohort, the broad-spectrum group had longer duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy (median interquartile range [IQR]: 8 [6 -11] day vs. 9 [7 -13] day; difference 1 day [95% CI, 0.31-1.69 day]) and length of hospital stay (median [IQR]: 13 [9 -20] day vs. 16 [11 -25] day; difference 3 day [95% CI, 1.87-4.13 day]), compared with the narrow-spectrum group. In this large-scale study using a Japanese claims database, broad-spectrum empiric therapy was not associated with improved clinical outcomes, compared with narrow-spectrum empiric therapy. Therefore, the necessity of broad-spectrum empiric therapy may be limited in clinical practice, and narrow-spectrum empiric therapy may represent an effective treatment strategy for acute cholangitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.